Onarcade filing false claims against gubug - Page 16

peter_anderson · 06-21-2008, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkal

I think Hans is a f*cking c*nt for filing a DMCA with google against digitali16, another victim in this ordeal

.

Hans was right to try and stop illegal copies of onArcade being used

woochoochinchilla · 06-21-2008, 08:24 AM

Thinking in accordance to the law hans is in the right. But going back a little Hans gave a free license to that other arcade that was in the exact same boat. The only reason hans wouldn't give one to digitali16 was because he pissed him off by posting here.

Hans is just being stubborn because he didn't try hard enough to contact digitali16. He kept saying "If I keep pushing him into hell by filing DMCA's he will buy a license. Then I won't look like a total *** and will get some of my reputation back." But in reality every one who reads this thread will see that he gave a free license to someone in the exact same boat as digitali16 after the thread was started and won't consider onarcade again.

peter_anderson · 06-21-2008, 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woochoochinchilla

Thinking in accordance to the law hans is in the right. But going back a little Hans gave a free license to that other arcade that was in the exact same boat. The only reason hans wouldn't give one to digitali16 was because he pissed him off by posting here.

Hans is just being stubborn because he didn't try hard enough to contact digitali16. He kept saying "If I keep pushing him into hell by filing DMCA's he will buy a license. Then I won't look like a total *** and will get some of my reputation back." But in reality every one who reads this thread will see that he gave a free license to someone in the exact same boat as digitali16 after the thread was started and won't consider onarcade again.

I think that digital could have simply emailed Hans to discuss the dmca instead of making it public

hitsfree · 06-21-2008, 09:12 AM

Peter wrote - "I think that digital could have simply emailed Hans to discuss the dmca instead of making it public"

Very true. Digitali16 made all this public when he didn't have to.

hawkal · 06-21-2008, 11:35 AM

Well I certainly hope that this hurts Hans reputation more then the value of stopping Digitali16 from using the script and that people don't consider buying onarcade regardless of how good it may be

.

06-21-2008, 08:24 AM	#152 (permalink)
woochoochinchilla Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 792	Thinking in accordance to the law hans is in the right. But going back a little Hans gave a free license to that other arcade that was in the exact same boat. The only reason hans wouldn't give one to digitali16 was because he pissed him off by posting here. Hans is just being stubborn because he didn't try hard enough to contact digitali16. He kept saying "If I keep pushing him into hell by filing DMCA's he will buy a license. Then I won't look like a total *** and will get some of my reputation back." But in reality every one who reads this thread will see that he gave a free license to someone in the exact same boat as digitali16 after the thread was started and won't consider onarcade again. __________________

06-21-2008, 09:12 AM	#154 (permalink)
hitsfree Cranky Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 510	Peter wrote - "I think that digital could have simply emailed Hans to discuss the dmca instead of making it public" Very true. Digitali16 made all this public when he didn't have to. __________________ 100% accuracy and nothing less!

06-21-2008, 11:35 AM	#155 (permalink)
hawkal Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 208	Well I certainly hope that this hurts Hans reputation more then the value of stopping Digitali16 from using the script and that people don't consider buying onarcade regardless of how good it may be. __________________ www.ownage.us www.Allarcade.us

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode