What is your point Hitsfree? - Page 2

evilfurby · 10-05-2008, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperNovaArcade

2nd post right after Booty:
Originally Posted by .11 View Post
He just post mindless crap to get index by search engines tbh. He claims it's the "truth." But notice how he never cites anything. You know why? Because it will be from some right wing propaganda site.

Have you any opinions of your own rather than to quote someone else? I can just imagine it... An arcade webmaster forum is overtaking the political blogosphere right as we speak. *LOL*
Anyways, .11 post that you quoted is false. He has cited some things. Read.

dWhite · 10-05-2008, 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evilfurby

Have you any opinions of your own rather than to quote someone else? I can just imagine it... An arcade webmaster forum is overtaking the political blogosphere right as we speak. *LOL*
Anyways, .11 post that you quoted is false. He has cited some things. Read.

I'd rather not read, as I stated in another thread I really hate politics.

I support the merger.

.11 · 10-05-2008, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evilfurby

I don't agree with the merge. Obama supporters have every oppurtunity to start their own threads if they wish. hitsfree's topics were about separate issues and shouldn't have been merged!

I was planning to as you saw with the one I posted before. But I cant be bothered to spam the lounge section.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evilfurby

Have you any opinions of your own rather than to quote someone else? I can just imagine it... An arcade webmaster forum is overtaking the political blogosphere right as we speak. *LOL*
Anyways, .11 post that you quoted is false. He has cited some things. Read.

You didnt you see what I did there in that post? I did what hitsfree does, I made a judgment on some threads not all, without checking it if it is true

.

As in hitsfree makes judgments on some informationm, not all, without checking if it is true.

hitsfree · 10-05-2008, 08:12 PM

The merger isn't going to help the web traffic.
Silly really. I take it Moderator isn't really open-minded
from this action.

Check your logs and you will see site traffic associated
with certain earlier posts.

I got some threats from people (not on TA), and based on
certain posts on TA. So they were getting noticed.

.11 you haven't pointed out any actual errors in my posts, yet.

.11 · 10-06-2008, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hitsfree

The merger isn't going to help the web traffic.
Silly really. I take it Moderator isn't really open-minded
from this action.

Check your logs and you will see site traffic associated
with certain earlier posts.

I got some threats from people (not on TA), and based on
certain posts on TA. So they were getting noticed.

.11 you haven't pointed out any actual errors in my posts, yet.

Political web traffic to an arcade webmaster site? I believe it was also the Admin, not a Mod.

Your trillion spending post.

Washingtonpost fact checker:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fac...r_spendin.html

If my desktop was working I would make a nice clean post, but I am stuck on my laptop and it shuts of sometimes. It will take to long, as this is the third time Im typing this post.

hitsfree · 10-06-2008, 05:35 PM

Washington Compost is pure manure .11. Accuracy is not to be found
in manure.

By the way, Ralph Nader wrote to them, complaining that they never cover him in the compost, which is true. Why, after all he is running for president.

The Washington Compost wrote back that the reason they aren't is because he hasn't got a chance of winning.

Well Ralph wrote back, but neither do the Nationals, and you cover them.

But even your article alludes to the following:
A very different calculation has been made by the conservative National Taxpayers Union, which has compiled a much more detailed list of the two candidates' proposed spending plans. According to NTU calculations, Obama is proposing net spending increases of around $292 billion a year, or more than $1 trillion over four years.

QED.

.11 · 10-06-2008, 06:40 PM

Is this what you plan to do, call every source I bring up manure?

And you say accuracy can not be found in the article. But quote something from the actual article?

oh btw

Quote:

The NTU Foundation looks only at spending, and makes no attempt to look at the overall fiscal implications of the two candidates' tax plans. Senior analyst Demian Brady said it was unclear whether the Obama spending proposals would be financed by tax increases, or an increase in the national debt.

Jason Furman, a senior Obama economics adviser, dismissed the NTU analysis as politically "partisan." He said that the NTU was counting Obama's refundable health tax credits as extra government "spending," and ignored various spending cuts proposed by Obama. The McCain campaign did not respond for a request for comment.

I need to search Washington Post for an article, I find it really interesting now, since I see your above post.

10-05-2008, 08:12 PM	#14 (permalink)
hitsfree Cranky Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 533	The merger isn't going to help the web traffic. Silly really. I take it Moderator isn't really open-minded from this action. Check your logs and you will see site traffic associated with certain earlier posts. I got some threats from people (not on TA), and based on certain posts on TA. So they were getting noticed. .11 you haven't pointed out any actual errors in my posts, yet. __________________ 100% accuracy and nothing less!

10-06-2008, 05:35 PM	#16 (permalink)
hitsfree Cranky Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 533	Washington Compost is pure manure .11. Accuracy is not to be found in manure. By the way, Ralph Nader wrote to them, complaining that they never cover him in the compost, which is true. Why, after all he is running for president. The Washington Compost wrote back that the reason they aren't is because he hasn't got a chance of winning. Well Ralph wrote back, but neither do the Nationals, and you cover them. But even your article alludes to the following: A very different calculation has been made by the conservative National Taxpayers Union, which has compiled a much more detailed list of the two candidates' proposed spending plans. According to NTU calculations, Obama is proposing net spending increases of around $292 billion a year, or more than $1 trillion over four years. QED. __________________ 100% accuracy and nothing less!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Point System for arcade site	nEo	Talk Arcades	3	08-26-2008 02:25 AM
New Game - Sift Heads Zero:The Starting Point	noiamtheone	Content	0	07-15-2008 09:14 AM
Hit Point Fusion ~ Could you please review	kiviniar	Site Showcase and Reviews	5	03-14-2007 02:55 PM